16th United European Gastroenterology Week
18 - 22 October 2008 · ACV · Vienna · Austria



































Inquiry

UEGW Evaluation Form

The 16th UEGW is accredited to provide CME activity by the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME). If you would like to require CME credits please indicate above your badge number and/or full name. In order to obtain CME credits, the UEGF requires feedback on its educational activities. Therefore, we kindly ask you to complete this evaluation form.

Among all submitted forms, 10 free registrations for the Gastro 2009 UEGW/WCOG, London will be drawn.

In case you would like to take part in the drawings for your free registration for the Gastro 2009 UEGW/WCOG, London please indicate your badge number and/or full name. Otherwise you are welcome to complete your evaluation form anonymously.

ALuJog
To avoid the misuse of this Form, please insert in this field ONLY the RED LETTERS from the code above (the code is case sensitive):

Code: 


Badge Number:
Full name:

1 very poor   2 poor   3 satisfactory   4 good   5 outstanding

The Austria Center Vienna as congress venue
How do you rate the congress center (ACV) and lecture halls? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the signage? 1   2   3   4   5  
The lighting was 1   2   3   4   5  
The sound quality and projection were 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of coffee breaks, lunches and catering in general? 1   2   3   4   5  
Congress material
How do you rate the Preliminary Programme/Call for Abstracts (printed version)? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the Final Programme (printed version)? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the Abstract book? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the PGT Syllabus? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you like the new Congress bags? 1   2   3   4   5  
If you presented a paper/poster
How do you rate the online abstract handling programme? 1   2   3   4   5  
Notification of authors and instructions for authors were 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the Poster Exhibition set-up? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of discussion with chair persons of poster rounds? 1   2   3   4   5  
Postgraduate Teaching Programme (PGT)
How do you rate the selection of topics in general? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the selection of speakers? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of discussion and interaction? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the level of knowledge gained? 1   2   3   4   5  
Was company and product neutrality ensured during the sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
ESGE & Ultrasound Learning Area
How do you rate the Lecture Theatre & DVD Learning Center? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the Ultrasound Learning Area? 1   2   3   4   5  
Scientific Programme/Sessions
How do you rate the selection of topics? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the selection of speakers? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the presentation of the lectures (clarity, media support, etc.)? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the time management of scientific sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the level of knowledge gained? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the balance between symposia and free paper sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the selection of topics of presented Clinical Cases? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of discussion and interaction of Clinical Cases? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the selection of topics of Basic Science Workshops? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of discussion and interaction of Basic Science? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the selection of topics of Lunch Sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of discussion and interaction of Lunch Sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the quality of the Video Case Sessions? 1   2   3   4   5  
Was company and product neutrality ensured during the sessions? yes       No  
Industry Exhibition
The exhibition was scientifically useful 1   2   3   4   5  
There was ample time to visit the exhibition 1   2   3   4   5  
Were there any particular exhibitors you missed during the exhibition? yes       no  
If so, which exhibitors did you miss? (please fill in):
Registration / Accommodation
The online registration and housing procedure was efficient 1   2   3   4   5  
The agency was efficient and friendly when contacted directly by phone or mail 1   2   3   4   5  
Onsite registration procedure was efficient 1   2   3   4   5  
Onsite housing requests were handled efficiently 1   2   3   4   5  
The accommodation price range was suitable 1   2   3   4   5  
The accompanying persons programme was enjoyable 1   2   3   4   5  
UEGF/UEGW Secretariat
How do you rate the competence and friendliness whenever called / emailed? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the response time - was it adequately? 1   2   3   4   5  
How do you rate the efficiency of the congress organisation? 1   2   3   4   5  
General
How do you rate the user friendliness of the congress website? 1   2   3   4   5  
Did you use “My schedule” which was available on the congress website? yes       no      
How are you satisfied with UEGW Vienna 2008 in general? 1   2   3   4   5  
Do you plan to attend the GASTRO 2009 UEGW/WCOG, London? yes       no      
How are you satisfied with the Postgraduate Teaching Programme? 1   2   3   4   5  
Do you plan to attend the Postgraduate Teaching Programme at the GASTRO 2009 UEGW/WCOG, London? yes       no      
 
Suggestions and recommendations for the future: